Activity tagged "Hachette v. Internet Archive"

Posted:

Thank you to everyone who helped raise $4,211 to support the Internet Archive’s Open Library!

Defend the Internet Archive
Bid on a print to support the Internet Archive's Open Library
Image: A 6x8" linocut print in black ink depicting a person in a dress reaching for a book on a large bookshelf. Above is “Free people read freely”; below is “Defend the Internet Archive”. The print is propped up against a shelf of books.
Organized by Molly White
$4,211
10 Supporters
Story

The recent Second Circuit decision in Hachette v. Internet Archive is only the latest battle in the war on libraries and the freedom to read. Support the Internet Archive's Open Library and fight to protect libraries and readers.

All proceeds go to the Internet Archive's Open Library.

Confirmation screen: Thank you, Molly! We deeply appreciate your donation of $4211.00. Your generosity helps us promote Universal Access to All Knowledge.h

Posted:

If you would like to bid on one of the ten hand-printed lino prints, all proceeds are going to the Internet Archive's Open Library.

https://givebutter.com/c/2cScHO/auction

Read:

"CDL: Publishers Against Books".

Gio in GioCities. Published March 3, 2024.

Combining lending with digital technology is tricky to do within the constraints of copyright. But it’s important to still be able to lend, especially for libraries. With a system called Controlled Digital Lending, libraries like the Internet Archive (IA) made digital booklending work within the constraints of copyright, but publishers still want to shut it down. It’s a particularly ghoulish example of companies rejecting copyright and instead pursuing their endless appetite for profit at the expense of everything worthwhile about the industry.

Posted:

Seen a couple takes about the Hachette case along the lines of “the Internet Archive should’ve stuck to just archiving the Internet and not testing new theories of copyright” and uhhh... I’m not sure what it is you think the Internet Archive does, outside of testing new theories of copyright.

People have gotten so used to the existence of the Internet Archive’s web archive that they forget how revolutionary and subversive it is. The idea that that is somehow safe while the book lending was not is completely flawed. They were just up against a more powerful group.

What was the alternative? That they only archive and distribute works that are copyrighted by people with sufficiently little power/wealth?

Posted:

The Internet Archive lost its appeal in the Hachette case. What a devastating loss for all of us.

Page