BlueSky’s “user intents” is a good proposal, and it’s weird to see some people flaming them for it as though this is equivalent to them welcoming in AI scraping (rather than trying to add a consent signal to allow users to communicate preferences for the scraping that is already happening).
I think the weakness with this and Creative Commons’ similar proposal for “preference signals” is that they rely on scrapers to respect these signals out of some desire to be good actors. We’ve already seen some of these companies blow right past robots.txt or pirate material to scrape.
I do think that they are good technical foundations, and there is the potential for enforcement to be layered atop them.
Technology alone won’t solve this issue, nor will it provide the levers for enforcement, so it’s somewhat reasonable that they don’t attempt to.
But it would be nice to see some more proactive recognition from groups proposing these signals that enforcement is going to be needed, and perhaps some ideas for how their signals could be incorporated into such a regime.